Nick's Baiting Me
And anyone else with half a brain who has seen both LOST and Heroes.
And anyone else with half a brain who has seen both LOST and Heroes.
A new entry over at the Forbidden Gospels Blog.
For an $800 billion proposal, I was actually impressed by how sound and non-wasteful the underlying proposals were. There's nothing silly or wasteful about things like pandemic flu preparation, volcano monitoring, and even "honeybee insurance" (i.e., livestock decimation insurance). God seems to agree -- we've already seen volcanos and flu outbreaks that seem Intelligently Designed to poke fun at certain stimulus critics. I suspect a more general livestock famine isn't far away.:)
Both Mark Goodacre and Loren Rosson recommend you join it. I followed their advice. So should you!
My phone has been receiving blank text messages from the past and the future the last few days...
Since I linked to this video yesterday, I've seen it at Kottke, Matt Yglesias, Reihan Salan, again at The American Scene, and at Nick's blog. I've watched it every time. It gets better. Every. Time. One more time...
I've been enjoying the discussion (or at least interval-ed volleys--so far, there doesn't seem to be much "discussing") between John Hobbins and James McGrath on Christianity, Inerrancy, and particularly, the book of Joshua. But I agree with Jim West that this sentence by Hobbins is a bit...shall we say "weighty" (in a non-positive way):
The accounts in the book of Joshua are historical, not in terms of chronicle, but in a structural-anthropological sort of way, as historicized foundation legends typically are.Jim critiques:
To argue with such a claim we have to knowNow, I don't know that I would completely agree that 'legend' and 'historic' have to be mutually exclusive,* but it depends a lot on the context (i.e., are we using the term 'legend' in a genre-identification sense [which it appears Hobbins is], a popular sense, or a dictionary sense). Either way, it seems like John could have been a bit more clear off the bat in how he means Joshua to be historical.
1- what a ’structural-anthropological sort of way’ is and
2- what a ‘historicized foundation legend’ is.
And if we are to take the word ‘legend’ with any sort of seriousness or in any normal sense, then the concept of ‘historicity’ is immediately undermined.
I wonder if I could make my own, or if there's one similar to the Journaling ESV for sale...
[Via Mark Driscoll, though I recoil from claims like "the ESV Study Bible is the new standard for study Bibles"]
This is more for me than anything else, but Matt Seitz recently put together a pretty cool series of posts on Wes Anderson and his influences. I love Wes Anderson, but have been disappointed by his more recent work. I haven't had a chance to look at the videos yet, but they're supposed to be awesome.
ETC is reporting that the Virtual Manuscript Room will launch in July. Along with CSNTM (and possibly, it looks like, Open Scriptures), things are looking up for web-based text critics.
Yesterday was my birthday. No, not April Fool's, it really was my birthday. It was quite a long day, and included:
