What's on my mind?

1.28.2009

Soooooo GOOD

If you're not watching LOST, you're depriving yourself of one of the few, truly pure pleasures on earth.

Things We Know Now:

  • Richard really doesn't age. No idea why not.
  • Widmore was on the island, perhaps even born on the island.
  • Widmore's not Jacob.
  • Locke is the most awesome human ever to walk the planet.

Things We Can Only Speculate About:

  • Faraday was being held gunpoint by Ms. Hawking, who is his mother.
  • Faraday appears to have unstuck his girlfriend/test subject in time, only she's not dying from the time sickness. She seems to be bopping around like the island.

Forgot to mention in my earlier post, I think Abbadon was also on the island at some point, and his fate was in Locke's hands, and Locke chose to let him go. This gets even more interesting since Abbadon appears to work for Widmore.

Unstuck in Time

Speaking of LOST, I didn't get to go through my annual ritual of re-watching the entire series leading up to last week's season premiere. I did, however, get to re-watch Season 4 this week. I have a few thoughts, picking up where I last left off, on what's going on.

First of all, I think I deserve a few pats on the back. I correctly surmised that Sun and Widmore's "common interest" was Ben (and, more specifically, killing him). It seems pretty clear that the two people Sun blames are Ben and her father. I'm still not clear on how she found out that it was Ben who started the chain reaction that led to the freighter exploding, though it seems likely that Locke/Bentham told her. On the question of Jin's death, the jury's still out. He's a regular this season, but the producer's have been pretty cryptic/coy in their responses about his status. I also correctly noted (though it wasn't difficult to do) that the island was moving in time. Apparently, however, it's also moving in space, as the screenshot above would seem to indicate. It looks like each flash is associated with a new move in space, and somehow Ms. Hawking and Ben have been able to locate the island for the next 70 hours.

I still don't know Ben's angle, but it'll be interesting to see how he re-unites the O6 in the next 70 hours. I am finally rooting for him at this point, but only because I want to see everyone back on the island. In terms of the very bad things that happened, clearly they have something to do with the flashes through time.

Other thoughts from re-watching Season 4: Claire is definitely dead. I don't think she died when the mortar hit her cabin, but I think she had some sort of internal injury that eventually killed her. I think this is what Miles sensed when he kept staring at her. She dies and leaves Aaron behind, going to join her father in Jacob's cabin. The fact that they're both their, and that at least Christian "speaks for [Jacob]" makes me think that Jacob might indeed be Jack in the future. I'm also open to the possibility that Jacob is actually Widmore, which is why Ben knows that he can't kill Widmore. I don't think that Jacob is going to be someone we've never seen before, though.

Thoughts for Season 5: I can't imagine that the people who got left behind on the island are really going to be stuck for three years while the O6 traipse around the world off-island. I think it's more likely that they flash to some point in the future, meeting up with the current O6 timeline, and that's when Jack et al return. But maybe not. Either way, they'll be reunited sometime within the first half of the season. This season is supposed to be about the island, so the flashes should give lots of opportunities to learn about the island's history. I couldn't help but notice that both Chang and Hawking retorted "then God help us all" when questioned on what would happen if the energy source were released/the O6 can't be returned to the island in the next 70 hours. Seems like there's some relationship there. I'm loving the time travel stuff. My only reservation is what's happening with Desmond. I LOVE that the producer's have been very careful with time travel and "the rules," i.e., you can't change time because whatever's happened has already happened. Which is why I'm so worried that, apparently, "the rules" don't apply to Desmond. What does that mean? Why does he suddenly have the memory three years later? Why not at the same approximate time as Faraday's speaking to him (which would have been a few hours after the island flashed)? I hope they have a good answer for all that. Until next week!

the blogging bug bites

four posts in one day. CRAZY frequency. it helps to have the entire city shut down.

Man of Science, Man of Faith

If you recognize the title of this post, you ought to do yourself a favor and check out the video currently on James McGrath's blog. But, unfortunately for us all, this post is not actually about LOST.

Jim West links to a recent article in The New Republic on the reconciliation (or lack thereof) of modern science and theology. He seems to think science and faith are competing answers to the of "Is there a god?" I don't see any reason why that should be (as I commented here and here). Faith and science simply have very little to do with each other.

Science does not presuppose that there is no God (or that there is one). Science simply observes and predicts on the basis of those observations. Theology and science, as any good studies do, go about attempting to explain various phenomena; but they are completely different sets of phenomena, and completely different explanations. Paul asked "What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?" Similarly, what have astrophysics, modern medicine, or anything else to do with Jesus Christ?

An individual scientist might be motivated by their love for God and his creation to study biology or medicine as much as another individual scientist might be motivated by their conviction that there is no God to study the same. But neither of them can claim that science itself must assume the truth of their love and convictions. Science, really good science, does not investigate God because God is not an observable, repeatable phenomenon. And theology, really good theology, doesn't go about answering the question of how the universe was created, or how we might replicate the parting of the Red Sea.

[Related: Drew Tatusko comments on the same article; Doug Chaplin comments on Jim West.]

Mac vs. PC

If Nick would simply break down and enter into the world of Apple, he might find a computer or two that maintain their usefulness longer than 6 months...

I love snow days

Dallas, at 4:45pm, on a Wednesday.

1.26.2009

So Weird

...to see the school I used to work for in the news.

1.21.2009

The New Economy

A few days ago, I saw that my neighborhood Office Depot (that opened just a year ago) was having a going out of business sale. "STORE CLOSING" "20%-50% OFF!!" the signs read. What they should have said was "prices still 20-50% higher than Amazon."

What do you a call a business model that depends on its customers NOT checking out competitor's prices? BANKRUPT (rim shot!).

This is what change looks like


I just spent 15 minutes subscribing to White House RSS Feeds. Feels good.

1.15.2009

Do You Want Your Head to Explode???

Then go read this interview with Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof about the season premiere (and subsequent seasons) of LOST. All last semester, when I had assignments piling up like crazy, I used the season premiere as a demarcation. If I could make it to LOST Season 5, I would (1) complete my last semester at DTS, (2) submit the first draft of my thesis, (3) read at national ETS, and (4) be engaged. And now all those things are done, Season 5 is almost here, and I'm going crazy. Good times!

1.14.2009

Supporting Research into New Testament Manuscripts

I have been asked to forward along an announcement from CSNTM as they raise support for the coming year. As I have had the privilege of going along on some of their expeditions, I can say without reservation that CSNTM is doing great work that not that many out there seem interested in pursuing. Dr. Wallace truly is driven to see this mission to completion, and I wouldn't bet against him.

Two DVD videos on the reliability of the New Testament manuscripts

Several have asked about getting a hold of Dr. Daniel B. Wallace’s plenary address, delivered at the Evangelical Theological Society’s annual meeting in November 2008; others have wanted to get his lecture at apologetics conferences and in churches on whether our Bible today essentially reflects the wording of the original text. Both of these lectures are now available as video DVDs. They would make great Christmas presents—and the price is nominal. The ordering information is available below.

“Is What We Have Now What They Wrote Then?”
A lecture at an apologetics conference in Providence, Rhode Island, 2008, about whether our printed New Testaments today accurately represent the original text.

“Challenges in New Testament Textual Criticism for the 21st Century”
A plenary lecture at the annual Evangelical Theological Society meeting in Providence, Rhode Island, 2008, on current issues in NT textual criticism.

The price of each video DVD is $10 plus $3 S&H. The price of both video DVDs together is $15 plus $3 S&H. Texas residents also will pay 8.25% sales tax. Allow two to four weeks for delivery.

To order, go to http://www.nttextualcriticism.com/tcct/DVDPaypal.htm.


Also, if you haven’t signed up yet, you owe it to yourself to get the free monthly e-newsletter of the Friends of CSNTM (the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts). ‘Friends’ update you on the adventures of Dr. Wallace and his team as they travel all over the world in search of New Testament manuscripts. To sign up, simply respond to this email. You’ll get the next e-newsletter at the beginning of the month.

Friends of CSNTM
To see more, click here to make a donation or take a look at some of the special offers available to donors.

1.13.2009

Wow

I'm catching up on various blog posts from the past few weeks, and I'm realizing that the best way to draw attention to your site/blog is to do a Top 100 list.

1.01.2009

Happy New Year!

Welcome to 2009, my friends. I set no new year resolutions, but it is
with great awe and trepidation that I recognize, between my coming
nuptials and application to various PhD programs, the supremely
determinative nature 2009 looks to have on my future. I hope to keep
you updated all along the way. Enjoy the festivities!